PIT
14-16 over 30 games. Both ends of the floor, the schedule they played and the roster behind them — with every night of the season below.
- Record
- 14-16
- +1.6
- 65.6
01 / Season
THE WHOLE SEASON
Every metric carries its own league rank. Hover any name for a plain-English explanation, the arithmetic, and why the number is worth looking at.
Record
-
14
9th of 16
-
16
9th of 16
lower is better
-
46.7%
9th of 16
-
+38.0
9th of 16
Efficiency
-
130.6
10th of 16
-
129.0
9th of 16
lower is better
-
+1.6
9th of 16
Four Factors
-
66.4%
9th of 16
-
67.8%
9th of 16
-
9.5%
9th of 16
lower is better
-
15.1%
14th of 16
-
0.157
14th of 16
Volume
-
102.6
10th of 16
-
101.3
7th of 16
lower is better
-
27.6
6th of 16
-
7.9
9th of 16
lower is better
-
3.47
8th of 16
-
31.3
10th of 16
-
5.1
16th of 16
-
5.9
12th of 16
-
2.7
9th of 16
Context
-
78.6
8th of 16
-
3.9
15th of 16
-
18.5
15th of 16
-
55.5
11th of 16
-
54.3%
9th of 16
-
-2.3
13th of 16
-
23.6
7th of 16
lower is better
-
20.0%
4th of 16
-
23.3%
15th of 16
-
-0.1
7th of 16
-
-6.8
14th of 16
-
0.162
15th of 16
lower is better
-
6.2
15th of 16
-
22.5%
15th of 16
-
89.8%
4th of 16
Composite
-
65.6
8th of 16
-
+1.7
9th of 16
02 / Splits
HOME AND AWAY
Home
7-8
15 games · 46.7% won
Away
7-8
15 games · 46.7% won
Close games / blowouts
6/ 7
within 5 points · 20+ point margins
16.3
wins the point margin implies · actual 14
-2.3
close games are near coin flips
23.6
standard deviation of per-game net rating
Four Factors, weighted
- 66.4%
- 9.5%
- 15.1%
- 0.157
- True shooting · 50%
- 56/100
- Assists per game · 30%
- 86/100
- Ball security · 20%
- 58/100
- MARIUS Score
- 65.6
TS 52–80% · AST/G 0–32 · TOV/G 5–12
03 / Game log
ALL 30 NIGHTS
14–16 · 30 games
| G | Opponent | Venue | Result | PTS | POSS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TOR | A | L | 94 | 102 | -8 | 82.7 | 113.6 | 123.3 | -9.7 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 6 | 13 | 52 |
| 2 | MIN | A | W | 121 | 88 | +33 | 77.2 | 156.8 | 114.0 | +42.8 | 37 | 6 | 38 | 7 | 28 | 74 |
| 3 | SEA | H | L | 102 | 105 | -3 | 82.1 | 124.3 | 127.9 | -3.7 | 29 | 10 | 35 | 7 | 21 | 56 |
| 4 | LAR | H | L | 97 | 113 | -16 | 76.2 | 127.2 | 148.2 | -21.0 | 27 | 9 | 23 | 2 | 25 | 54 |
| 5 | OAK | H | W | 102 | 84 | +18 | 73.8 | 138.1 | 113.8 | +24.4 | 24 | 12 | 38 | 2 | 20 | 54 |
| 6 | DCS | A | W | 110 | 79 | +31 | 75.6 | 145.5 | 104.5 | +41.0 | 20 | 3 | 37 | 2 | 21 | 60 |
| 7 | NYE | H | L | 107 | 129 | -22 | 82.2 | 130.2 | 157.0 | -26.8 | 31 | 9 | 15 | 4 | 26 | 74 |
| 8 | DAL | H | L | 70 | 108 | -38 | 77.1 | 90.8 | 140.1 | -49.3 | 20 | 12 | 24 | 0 | 23 | 48 |
| 9 | OAK | A | L | 84 | 97 | -13 | 80.1 | 104.9 | 121.1 | -16.2 | 23 | 6 | 31 | 4 | 6 | 62 |
| 10 | SEA | A | L | 117 | 121 | -4 | 86.2 | 135.8 | 140.4 | -4.6 | 37 | 11 | 33 | 4 | 21 | 76 |
| 11 | VBN | H | W | 95 | 80 | +15 | 73.6 | 129.1 | 108.7 | +20.4 | 27 | 10 | 39 | 4 | 12 | 52 |
| 12 | CHI | A | L | 102 | 113 | -11 | 79.2 | 128.9 | 142.7 | -13.9 | 25 | 9 | 31 | 2 | 19 | 54 |
| 13 | VAN | H | L | 101 | 110 | -9 | 89.0 | 113.5 | 123.7 | -10.1 | 27 | 6 | 38 | 4 | 8 | 62 |
| 14 | LVS | H | W | 107 | 97 | +10 | 79.1 | 135.3 | 122.7 | +12.6 | 33 | 8 | 38 | 4 | 14 | 38 |
| 15 | DET | A | L | 99 | 108 | -9 | 78.1 | 126.8 | 138.3 | -11.5 | 26 | 6 | 29 | 2 | 12 | 66 |
| 16 | LVS | A | W | 120 | 103 | +17 | 81.4 | 147.4 | 126.5 | +20.9 | 32 | 6 | 33 | 4 | 25 | 64 |
| 17 | TBS | H | W | 100 | 95 | +5 | 77.2 | 129.6 | 123.1 | +6.5 | 28 | 8 | 34 | 3 | 10 | 48 |
| 18 | DET | H | L | 103 | 121 | -18 | 77.5 | 132.9 | 156.1 | -23.2 | 31 | 7 | 31 | 7 | 24 | 52 |
| 19 | HOU | A | W | 108 | 91 | +17 | 79.3 | 136.2 | 114.8 | +21.4 | 25 | 10 | 29 | 0 | 13 | 46 |
| 20 | CHI | H | W | 106 | 95 | +11 | 70.6 | 150.1 | 134.6 | +15.6 | 29 | 2 | 33 | 6 | 17 | 48 |
| 21 | NYE | A | W | 128 | 117 | +11 | 78.2 | 163.7 | 149.6 | +14.1 | 38 | 5 | 20 | 8 | 15 | 52 |
| 22 | TOR | H | L | 116 | 118 | -2 | 77.6 | 149.5 | 152.1 | -2.6 | 31 | 7 | 25 | 5 | 28 | 38 |
| 23 | DAL | A | L | 100 | 104 | -4 | 82.7 | 120.9 | 125.7 | -4.8 | 30 | 8 | 25 | 2 | 20 | 48 |
| 24 | VAN | A | W | 112 | 85 | +27 | 79.4 | 141.1 | 107.1 | +34.0 | 30 | 9 | 42 | 10 | 31 | 62 |
| 25 | HOU | H | W | 90 | 85 | +5 | 76.2 | 118.2 | 111.6 | +6.6 | 26 | 9 | 31 | 0 | 14 | 58 |
| 26 | DCS | H | W | 109 | 90 | +19 | 75.7 | 144.0 | 118.9 | +25.1 | 18 | 12 | 39 | 7 | 15 | 62 |
| 27 | TBS | A | L | 69 | 106 | -37 | 78.8 | 87.6 | 134.6 | -47.0 | 22 | 11 | 29 | 0 | 14 | 40 |
| 28 | MIN | H | L | 108 | 115 | -7 | 76.1 | 142.0 | 151.2 | -9.2 | 29 | 4 | 22 | 2 | 13 | 48 |
| 29 | LAR | A | W | 114 | 85 | +29 | 74.0 | 154.1 | 114.9 | +39.2 | 30 | 3 | 26 | 8 | 32 | 62 |
| 30 | VBN | A | L | 86 | 95 | -9 | 80.0 | 107.6 | 118.8 | -11.3 | 20 | 8 | 37 | 2 | 16 | 56 |
04 / Cap
WHAT IT COSTS
13 contracts · $142.0M payroll · $23.0M under the cap
S4 payroll
$142.0M
13 contracts this season
Cap room
$23.0M
still to spend
Luxury-tax room
$73.0M
before the tax line
Dollars per win
$10.1M
14 wins bought
Committed beyond S4
$196.5M
already spent for S5 and S6
Salary concentration
0.088
HHI over 13 salaries
Top earner
Yaroslav Campbell
$20.0M
Team options / clauses
6/ 0
club options · trade clauses
The ledger over time — what this roster is already booked to cost in each season the export carries
Season 4
$142.0M
13 deals on the books
Season 5
$102.6M
8 deals on the books
-27.7% against S4
Season 6
$93.9M
7 deals on the books
| Player | Pos | Term | Option | S4 | S5 | S6 | PTS | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaroslav Campbell | C | 3 | — | $20.0M | $20.0M | $20.0M | 213 | 0.44× |
| Blanco Sky | PF | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | — | — | 792 | 2.18× |
| Jordan Scott | PG | 2 Years | — | $15.0M | $24.0M | $24.0M | 583 | 1.61× |
| Charles Timothy | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | — | — | 432 | 1.49× |
| Dee \"Fetty\" Fernandez | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | — |
| Shavon Shields | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | — |
| Ty Floyd | PG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | — |
| Malakai Simpson* | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | Clause: NPC | $10.0M | $7.0M | — | — | — |
| Wade Prophet-James | PF | 2+1 | Mutual +1 | $10.0M | $10.0M | $10.0M | 186 | 0.77× |
| Juan Maccabees | PF | 2+1 | Player +1 | $8.0M | $5.6M | $3.9M | 222 | 1.15× |
| Lucas Leak | PF | 2 | — | $6.0M | — | — | 111 | 0.77× |
| Braylen Knight | SG | 1 year | — | $5.0M | — | — | — | — |
| Yuhri Zafara | PG | 1 year | — | $5.0M | — | — | — | — |
05 / Notes
WHAT THE LOG SAYS
RECORD
01
14-16
PIT finished 14-16, 10th in the league by wins.
A 46.7% win rate over 30 games, outscoring opponents by 1.3 points a night. Their net rating of 1.6 ranks 9th, and the point margin says that record was worth 16.3 wins.
CONTEXT
02
+1.7
PIT rate 9th on the Simple Rating System.
Margin alone would put them at 1.3 points a game; the schedule they played rated -0.1, the 7th hardest in the league over the 30 games whose opponent is known. The two together rate them at 1.7, and they disagree with the raw margin by 0.4 points.
EFFICIENCY
03
130.6 / 129.0
PIT scored 130.6 and conceded 129.0 points per 100 possessions.
Offence ranks 10th, defence 9th — and on defence lower is better. Across 2,357 possessions at a pace of 78.6, that is a net rating of 1.6.
MARIUS
04
65.6
PIT scored 65.6 on the MARIUS Score.
Half of that is true shooting (67.8%), 30% is assists per game (27.6 — 6th in the league) and 20% is ball security (7.9 turnovers a game, 9th — where lower is better).
MARIUS
05
10.1%
PIT gave the ball away on 10.1% of their possessions.
Basketball-Reference's definition puts the turnover rate at 9.5% of plays used — 7.9 turnovers per game. Both are shown because they answer slightly different questions: one is per possession, the other per play.
ANOMALY
06
121-88
Their best night was a 121-88 win against MIN.
Game 2, a net rating of 42.8 on 77.2 possessions. They made 50 of 72 shots and pulled in 38 rebounds. It came on the road.
ANOMALY
07
70-108
Their worst night was a 70-108 loss against DAL.
Game 8, a net rating of -49.3. They turned the ball over 12 times and gave up 48 points in the paint.
RECORD
08
3/4
Their longest winning run was 3 games; the longest losing run 4.
Read off the game log in order, so a streak is a real sequence of results rather than a count of wins. They also played 6 games decided by five points or fewer (20.0%) and 7 decided by twenty or more (23.3%).
RECORD
09
7-8
At home PIT went 7-8; on the road 7-8.
46.7% of home games won against 46.7% away. Their home net rating was -2.7 and their away net rating 5.9 — the same team, two different levels.
CONTEXT
10
-6.8
PIT's scoring margin was -2.1 a game at home and 4.7 on the road.
That is a home-court edge of -6.8 points a game. Across the league the host outscores the visitor by -1.4, so the venue is doing less for them than it does for the average team.
STYLE
11
23.6
PIT's performance swung 23.6 net rating points between games.
The standard deviation of their per-game net rating, across 30 games with a box score. The league's steadiest side sits near 18.8; the wildest near 33.6.
CONTRACT
12
$20.0M
PIT pays Yaroslav Campbell $20.0M — 14.1% of its payroll.
A roster of 13 on $142.0M, comfortably under the cap. The spending is spread fairly evenly across the squad.