TOR
25-5 over 30 games. Both ends of the floor, the schedule they played and the roster behind them — with every night of the season below.
- Record
- 25-5
- +14.0
- 72.0
01 / Season
THE WHOLE SEASON
Every metric carries its own league rank. Hover any name for a plain-English explanation, the arithmetic, and why the number is worth looking at.
Record
-
25
1st of 16
-
5
1st of 16
lower is better
-
83.3%
1st of 16
-
+335.0
4th of 16
Efficiency
-
141.8
2nd of 16
-
127.7
7th of 16
lower is better
-
+14.0
4th of 16
Four Factors
-
69.4%
3rd of 16
-
71.2%
3rd of 16
-
8.2%
1st of 16
lower is better
-
15.0%
15th of 16
-
0.277
1st of 16
Volume
-
112.8
2nd of 16
-
101.6
8th of 16
lower is better
-
25.3
11th of 16
-
7.1
2nd of 16
lower is better
-
3.56
6th of 16
-
35.2
2nd of 16
-
6.7
5th of 16
-
6.6
2nd of 16
-
3.9
2nd of 16
Context
-
79.6
3rd of 16
-
5.2
9th of 16
-
26.5
3rd of 16
-
69.5
3rd of 16
-
81.1%
4th of 16
-
+0.7
5th of 16
-
24.0
10th of 16
lower is better
-
13.3%
8th of 16
-
36.7%
8th of 16
-
-1.3
15th of 16
-
-10.5
16th of 16
-
0.120
9th of 16
lower is better
-
8.3
9th of 16
-
38.3%
8th of 16
-
66.8%
7th of 16
Composite
-
72.0
3rd of 16
-
+10.4
4th of 16
02 / Splits
HOME AND AWAY
Home
10-4
14 games · 71.4% won
Away
15-1
16 games · 93.8% won
Close games / blowouts
4/ 11
within 5 points · 20+ point margins
24.3
wins the point margin implies · actual 25
+0.7
close games are near coin flips
24.0
standard deviation of per-game net rating
Four Factors, weighted
- 69.4%
- 8.2%
- 15.0%
- 0.277
- True shooting · 50%
- 69/100
- Assists per game · 30%
- 79/100
- Ball security · 20%
- 70/100
- MARIUS Score
- 72.0
TS 52–80% · AST/G 0–32 · TOV/G 5–12
03 / Game log
ALL 30 NIGHTS
25–5 · 30 games
| G | Opponent | Venue | Result | PTS | POSS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PIT | H | W | 102 | 94 | +8 | 80.0 | 127.6 | 117.6 | +10.0 | 30 | 5 | 35 | 2 | 12 | 76 |
| 2 | DAL | A | L | 110 | 124 | -14 | 82.6 | 133.2 | 150.2 | -17.0 | 19 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 13 | 58 |
| 3 | VAN | A | W | 116 | 99 | +17 | 78.8 | 147.2 | 125.6 | +21.6 | 26 | 6 | 30 | 4 | 23 | 56 |
| 4 | — | H | W | 111 | 103 | +8 | 77.8 | 142.7 | 132.4 | +10.3 | 25 | 9 | 35 | 2 | 16 | 70 |
| 5 | OAK | A | W | 99 | 73 | +26 | 73.6 | 134.5 | 99.2 | +35.3 | 22 | 6 | 35 | 9 | 27 | 64 |
| 6 | — | A | W | 129 | 121 | +8 | 92.4 | 139.6 | 130.9 | +8.7 | 34 | 6 | 32 | 4 | 21 | 74 |
| 7 | — | H | L | 95 | 118 | -23 | 79.6 | 119.4 | 148.3 | -28.9 | 21 | 9 | 33 | 8 | 27 | 52 |
| 8 | — | A | W | 122 | 119 | +3 | 88.8 | 137.3 | 133.9 | +3.4 | 18 | 8 | 41 | 4 | 14 | 74 |
| 9 | — | A | W | 115 | 108 | +7 | 76.2 | 150.8 | 141.7 | +9.2 | 25 | 7 | 34 | 4 | 17 | 60 |
| 10 | — | H | W | 117 | 100 | +17 | 76.0 | 153.9 | 131.6 | +22.4 | 24 | 2 | 38 | 2 | 30 | 76 |
| 11 | — | H | W | 121 | 105 | +16 | 82.6 | 146.6 | 127.2 | +19.4 | 27 | 10 | 34 | 0 | 27 | 86 |
| 12 | — | H | L | 109 | 111 | -2 | 82.6 | 132.0 | 134.4 | -2.4 | 24 | 13 | 35 | 6 | 26 | 74 |
| 13 | — | A | W | 106 | 100 | +6 | 81.0 | 130.9 | 123.5 | +7.4 | 22 | 9 | 38 | 2 | 26 | 60 |
| 14 | — | A | W | 115 | 113 | +2 | 79.9 | 144.0 | 141.5 | +2.5 | 22 | 6 | 39 | 12 | 36 | 66 |
| 15 | — | H | W | 109 | 96 | +13 | 80.4 | 135.5 | 119.3 | +16.2 | 30 | 9 | 47 | 4 | 15 | 66 |
| 16 | — | H | L | 100 | 113 | -13 | 72.4 | 138.1 | 156.1 | -18.0 | 34 | 4 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 52 |
| 17 | — | H | L | 79 | 121 | -42 | 78.6 | 100.5 | 153.9 | -53.4 | 28 | 12 | 49 | 11 | 40 | 90 |
| 18 | — | H | W | 106 | 91 | +15 | 71.6 | 148.0 | 127.1 | +20.9 | 23 | 5 | 25 | 4 | 37 | 62 |
| 19 | HOU | A | W | 120 | 86 | +34 | 76.2 | 157.6 | 112.9 | +44.6 | 30 | 5 | 28 | 4 | 38 | 74 |
| 20 | — | H | W | 127 | 99 | +28 | 84.7 | 150.0 | 116.9 | +33.1 | 25 | 7 | 39 | 6 | 28 | 82 |
| 21 | — | A | W | 118 | 116 | +2 | 77.8 | 151.7 | 149.1 | +2.6 | 24 | 8 | 32 | 4 | 19 | 66 |
| 22 | — | A | W | 123 | 103 | +20 | 81.7 | 150.6 | 126.1 | +24.5 | 29 | 7 | 34 | 6 | 27 | 82 |
| 23 | — | H | W | 117 | 110 | +7 | 85.4 | 137.1 | 128.9 | +8.2 | 31 | 11 | 27 | 2 | 13 | 72 |
| 24 | — | H | W | 106 | 80 | +26 | 78.8 | 134.5 | 101.5 | +33.0 | 18 | 3 | 34 | 2 | 15 | 60 |
| 25 | — | A | W | 124 | 87 | +37 | 72.9 | 170.0 | 119.3 | +50.7 | 3 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 36 | 72 |
| 26 | — | A | W | 119 | 61 | +58 | 77.4 | 153.8 | 78.9 | +75.0 | 26 | 6 | 58 | 12 | 25 | 82 |
| 27 | — | A | W | 115 | 90 | +25 | 69.2 | 166.3 | 130.1 | +36.1 | 31 | 5 | 39 | 9 | 34 | 70 |
| 28 | — | A | W | 113 | 96 | +17 | 82.0 | 137.8 | 117.1 | +20.7 | 27 | 5 | 39 | 4 | 54 | 80 |
| 29 | — | A | W | 119 | 110 | +9 | 84.3 | 141.2 | 130.5 | +10.7 | 29 | 6 | 33 | 10 | 23 | 78 |
| 30 | — | H | W | 122 | 102 | +20 | 82.2 | 148.4 | 124.1 | +24.3 | 32 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 54 | 52 |
04 / Cap
WHAT IT COSTS
12 contracts · $161.5M payroll · $3.5M under the cap
S4 payroll
$161.5M
12 contracts this season
Cap room
$3.5M
still to spend
Luxury-tax room
$53.5M
before the tax line
Dollars per win
$6.5M
25 wins bought
Committed beyond S4
$309.0M
already spent for S5 and S6
Salary concentration
0.100
HHI over 12 salaries
Top earner
James Hogan
$30.0M
Team options / clauses
10/ 0
club options · trade clauses
The ledger over time — what this roster is already booked to cost in each season the export carries
Season 4
$161.5M
12 deals on the books
Season 5
$177.5M
11 deals on the books
+9.9% against S4
Season 6
$131.5M
6 deals on the books
| Player | Pos | Term | Option | S4 | S5 | S6 | PTS | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Hogan | PF | 5 Years | — | $30.0M | $30.0M | $30.0M | 547 | 0.75× |
| Stoneway Rivers II | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $16.5M | $16.5M | $16.5M | 405 | 1.02× |
| Aquantis Melo | SG | 3+2 | Team +2 | $15.0M | $15.0M | $15.0M | 510 | 1.41× |
| Kuz Delil | PG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | $34.0M | $34.0M | 551 | 1.52× |
| Marius De Romanus | PF | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | $15.0M | — | 372 | 1.03× |
| Nicky Barnes | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | $24.0M | $24.0M | 352 | 0.97× |
| Creed Aventus | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | — |
| Sebastian McGlocklin | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | — | — | 159 | 0.55× |
| Baba Booey | SG | 2 Years | — | $8.0M | $8.0M | — | — | — |
| Eric Brasco | SG | 1+1 | Team +1 | $8.0M | $8.0M | — | 216 | 1.12× |
| Thiago Rose | PG | 1+1 | Team +1 | $8.0M | $8.0M | — | — | — |
| Roger Millz | PG | 1+1 | Team +1 | $7.0M | $7.0M | — | 29 | 0.17× |
05 / Notes
WHAT THE LOG SAYS
RECORD
01
25-5
TOR finished 25-5, 1st in the league by wins.
A 83.3% win rate over 30 games, outscoring opponents by 11.2 points a night. Their net rating of 14.0 ranks 4th, and the point margin says that record was worth 24.3 wins.
CONTEXT
02
+10.4
TOR rate 4th on the Simple Rating System.
Margin alone would put them at 11.2 points a game; the schedule they played rated -1.3, the 15th hardest in the league over the 5 games whose opponent is known. The two together rate them at 10.4, and they disagree with the raw margin by -0.7 points.
EFFICIENCY
03
141.8 / 127.7
TOR scored 141.8 and conceded 127.7 points per 100 possessions.
Offence ranks 2nd, defence 7th — and on defence lower is better. Across 2,387 possessions at a pace of 79.6, that is a net rating of 14.0.
MARIUS
04
72.0
TOR scored 72.0 on the MARIUS Score.
Half of that is true shooting (71.2%), 30% is assists per game (25.3 — 11th in the league) and 20% is ball security (7.1 turnovers a game, 2nd — where lower is better).
MARIUS
05
8.9%
TOR gave the ball away on 8.9% of their possessions.
Basketball-Reference's definition puts the turnover rate at 8.2% of plays used — 7.1 turnovers per game. Both are shown because they answer slightly different questions: one is per possession, the other per play.
ANOMALY
06
119-61
Their best night was a 119-61 win against OPP.
Game 26, a net rating of 75.0 on 77.4 possessions. They made 49 of 75 shots and pulled in 58 rebounds. It came on the road.
ANOMALY
07
79-121
Their worst night was a 79-121 loss against OPP.
Game 17, a net rating of -53.4. They turned the ball over 12 times and gave up 90 points in the paint.
RECORD
08
13/2
Their longest winning run was 13 games; the longest losing run 2.
Read off the game log in order, so a streak is a real sequence of results rather than a count of wins. They also played 4 games decided by five points or fewer (13.3%) and 11 decided by twenty or more (36.7%).
RECORD
09
10-4
At home TOR went 10-4; on the road 15-1.
71.4% of home games won against 93.8% away. Their home net rating was 7.0 and their away net rating 20.2 — the same team, two different levels.
CONTEXT
10
-10.5
TOR's scoring margin was 5.6 a game at home and 16.1 on the road.
That is a home-court edge of -10.5 points a game. Across the league the host outscores the visitor by -1.4, so the venue is doing less for them than it does for the average team.
STYLE
11
24.0
TOR's performance swung 24.0 net rating points between games.
The standard deviation of their per-game net rating, across 30 games with a box score. The league's steadiest side sits near 18.8; the wildest near 33.6.
CONTRACT
12
$161.5M
TOR bought the best record in the league: 25-5 on $161.5M.
$6.5M per win and the 4th-richest roster in the league — proof that the top of the table is not simply the top of the ledger.