OAK
15-15 over 30 games. Both ends of the floor, the schedule they played and the roster behind them — with every night of the season below.
- Record
- 15-15
- +2.7
- 63.7
01 / Season
THE WHOLE SEASON
Every metric carries its own league rank. Hover any name for a plain-English explanation, the arithmetic, and why the number is worth looking at.
Record
-
15
8th of 16
-
15
8th of 16
lower is better
-
50.0%
8th of 16
-
+63.0
8th of 16
Efficiency
-
133.4
8th of 16
-
130.7
10th of 16
lower is better
-
+2.7
8th of 16
Four Factors
-
67.3%
6th of 16
-
69.0%
6th of 16
-
10.5%
11th of 16
lower is better
-
22.8%
4th of 16
-
0.216
5th of 16
Volume
-
104.3
7th of 16
-
102.2
9th of 16
lower is better
-
26.0
10th of 16
-
8.8
11th of 16
lower is better
-
2.94
10th of 16
-
31.0
12th of 16
-
6.3
8th of 16
-
6.3
8th of 16
-
2.2
13th of 16
Context
-
78.2
10th of 16
-
4.7
12th of 16
-
16.1
16th of 16
-
67.7
4th of 16
-
57.1%
8th of 16
-
-2.1
12th of 16
-
33.6
16th of 16
lower is better
-
13.3%
9th of 16
-
46.7%
5th of 16
-
-0.4
11th of 16
-
-5.7
12th of 16
-
0.105
5th of 16
lower is better
-
9.5
5th of 16
-
38.6%
7th of 16
-
19.2%
16th of 16
Composite
-
63.7
10th of 16
-
+2.3
8th of 16
02 / Splits
HOME AND AWAY
Home
5-9
14 games · 35.7% won
Away
10-6
16 games · 62.5% won
Close games / blowouts
4/ 14
within 5 points · 20+ point margins
17.1
wins the point margin implies · actual 15
-2.1
close games are near coin flips
33.6
standard deviation of per-game net rating
Four Factors, weighted
- 67.3%
- 10.5%
- 22.8%
- 0.216
- True shooting · 50%
- 61/100
- Assists per game · 30%
- 81/100
- Ball security · 20%
- 45/100
- MARIUS Score
- 63.7
TS 52–80% · AST/G 0–32 · TOV/G 5–12
03 / Game log
ALL 30 NIGHTS
15–15 · 30 games
| G | Opponent | Venue | Result | PTS | POSS | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | — | H | L | 97 | 108 | -11 | 79.6 | 121.8 | 135.6 | -13.8 | 30 | 8 | 31 | 4 | 16 | 70 |
| 2 | — | H | L | 93 | 105 | -12 | 82.1 | 113.3 | 127.9 | -14.6 | 23 | 9 | 33 | 6 | 24 | 60 |
| 3 | — | A | W | 119 | 117 | +2 | 83.7 | 142.1 | 139.8 | +2.4 | 34 | 8 | 24 | 2 | 10 | 94 |
| 4 | — | A | W | 101 | 90 | +11 | 75.8 | 133.2 | 118.7 | +14.5 | 33 | 10 | 32 | 2 | 9 | 70 |
| 5 | — | A | L | 84 | 102 | -18 | 76.0 | 110.6 | 134.3 | -23.7 | 19 | 8 | 27 | 11 | 12 | 54 |
| 6 | — | H | L | 91 | 112 | -21 | 74.2 | 122.7 | 151.0 | -28.3 | 22 | 9 | 36 | 8 | 19 | 48 |
| 7 | — | H | L | 73 | 99 | -26 | 72.6 | 100.5 | 136.3 | -35.8 | 22 | 14 | 35 | 8 | 30 | 42 |
| 8 | — | H | W | 97 | 84 | +13 | 85.8 | 113.0 | 97.9 | +15.1 | 32 | 9 | 39 | 4 | 13 | 70 |
| 9 | — | A | L | 90 | 118 | -28 | 79.2 | 113.6 | 149.0 | -35.4 | 31 | 10 | 26 | 0 | 17 | 60 |
| 10 | — | H | L | 86 | 117 | -31 | 85.4 | 100.7 | 137.0 | -36.3 | 27 | 13 | 26 | 6 | 35 | 62 |
| 11 | — | A | L | 82 | 99 | -17 | 73.6 | 111.4 | 134.4 | -23.1 | 26 | 8 | 30 | 7 | 13 | 54 |
| 12 | — | H | L | 80 | 97 | -17 | 75.8 | 105.5 | 127.9 | -22.4 | 22 | 9 | 31 | 2 | 9 | 48 |
| 13 | — | A | W | 124 | 94 | +30 | 78.7 | 157.5 | 119.4 | +38.1 | 37 | 5 | 40 | 9 | 25 | 76 |
| 14 | — | A | L | 75 | 120 | -45 | 78.0 | 96.1 | 153.8 | -57.7 | 19 | 12 | 20 | 4 | 22 | 48 |
| 15 | — | A | W | 120 | 75 | +45 | 72.3 | 166.0 | 103.8 | +62.3 | 39 | 4 | 39 | 4 | 12 | 72 |
| 16 | — | H | L | 106 | 117 | -11 | 75.3 | 140.8 | 155.4 | -14.6 | 25 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 13 | 72 |
| 17 | — | A | W | 119 | 79 | +40 | 78.0 | 152.5 | 101.2 | +51.3 | 27 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 17 | 70 |
| 18 | — | A | W | 114 | 110 | +4 | 74.5 | 153.0 | 147.6 | +5.4 | 17 | 7 | 26 | 2 | 14 | 76 |
| 19 | — | H | L | 108 | 112 | -4 | 79.2 | 136.3 | 141.3 | -5.0 | 25 | 10 | 33 | 2 | 11 | 60 |
| 20 | DCS | H | W | 119 | 79 | +40 | 78.0 | 152.5 | 101.2 | +51.3 | 27 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 17 | 70 |
| 21 | LVS | H | L | 103 | 119 | -16 | 77.0 | 133.8 | 154.5 | -20.8 | 21 | 13 | 28 | 2 | 12 | 68 |
| 22 | DET | A | L | 88 | 124 | -36 | 75.3 | 116.9 | 164.7 | -47.8 | 26 | 16 | 28 | 4 | 22 | 46 |
| 23 | VBN | A | W | 102 | 94 | +8 | 75.8 | 134.6 | 124.0 | +10.6 | 19 | 9 | 33 | 6 | 12 | 82 |
| 24 | LAR | A | W | 132 | 78 | +54 | 79.4 | 166.3 | 98.3 | +68.0 | 27 | 9 | 37 | 3 | 26 | 90 |
| 25 | LVS | A | L | 138 | 143 | -5 | 89.1 | 154.8 | 160.5 | -5.6 | 41 | 8 | 26 | 4 | 11 | 82 |
| 26 | HOU | H | W | 122 | 79 | +43 | 75.2 | 162.3 | 105.1 | +57.2 | 23 | 4 | 34 | 8 | 12 | 96 |
| 27 | DAL | A | W | 116 | 105 | +11 | 80.3 | 144.4 | 130.7 | +13.7 | 25 | 8 | 32 | 11 | 4 | 70 |
| 28 | SEA | H | W | 119 | 98 | +21 | 78.8 | 151.0 | 124.4 | +26.6 | 21 | 9 | 33 | 6 | 15 | 74 |
| 29 | TOR | A | W | 122 | 102 | +20 | 78.4 | 155.5 | 130.0 | +25.5 | 22 | 9 | 32 | 0 | 10 | 82 |
| 30 | DAL | H | W | 108 | 89 | +19 | 77.7 | 139.0 | 114.5 | +24.4 | 17 | 7 | 36 | 6 | 21 | 66 |
04 / Cap
WHAT IT COSTS
12 contracts · $113.0M payroll · $52.0M under the cap
S4 payroll
$113.0M
12 contracts this season
Cap room
$52.0M
still to spend
Luxury-tax room
$102.0M
before the tax line
Dollars per win
$7.5M
15 wins bought
Committed beyond S4
$98.0M
already spent for S5 and S6
Salary concentration
0.096
HHI over 12 salaries
Top earner
Jay Wilson
$15.0M
Team options / clauses
10/ 0
club options · trade clauses
The ledger over time — what this roster is already booked to cost in each season the export carries
Season 4
$113.0M
12 deals on the books
Season 5
$73.0M
8 deals on the books
-35.4% against S4
Season 6
$25.0M
3 deals on the books
| Player | Pos | Term | Option | S4 | S5 | S6 | PTS | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Wilson | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | — | — | 635 | 1.75× |
| Johnny Domer | PG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $15.0M | $15.0M | — | 396 | 1.09× |
| Arthur Norman | C | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | 192 | 0.66× |
| DeMarcus Pope | PF | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | — | — | 638 | 2.20× |
| Jaylen Jackson | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $12.0M | $12.0M | $12.0M | — | — |
| Ryo Barouki | — | 2 Years | — | $10.0M | $10.0M | — | — | — |
| Bubba Flex | PF | 2+1 | Team +1 | $8.0M | $8.0M | $8.0M | 177 | 0.92× |
| Daniel Tyson | SF | 2+1 | Team +1 | $8.0M | — | — | 138 | 0.71× |
| Hanamichi Sakuragi | — | 2 Years | — | $6.0M | $6.0M | — | — | — |
| Gardner Minshew XVIII | C | 1+1 | Team +1 | $5.0M | $5.0M | — | 166 | 1.37× |
| Jeremiah Holloway | SG | 1+1 | Team +1 | $5.0M | — | — | 15 | 0.12× |
| Shintaro Midorima | SG | 2+1 | Team +1 | $5.0M | $5.0M | $5.0M | 150 | 1.24× |
05 / Notes
WHAT THE LOG SAYS
RECORD
01
15-15
OAK finished 15-15, 8th in the league by wins.
A 50.0% win rate over 30 games, outscoring opponents by 2.1 points a night. Their net rating of 2.7 ranks 8th, and the point margin says that record was worth 17.1 wins.
CONTEXT
02
+2.3
OAK rate 8th on the Simple Rating System.
Margin alone would put them at 2.1 points a game; the schedule they played rated -0.4, the 11th hardest in the league over the 11 games whose opponent is known. The two together rate them at 2.3, and they disagree with the raw margin by 0.2 points.
EFFICIENCY
03
133.4 / 130.7
OAK scored 133.4 and conceded 130.7 points per 100 possessions.
Offence ranks 8th, defence 10th — and on defence lower is better. Across 2,345 possessions at a pace of 78.2, that is a net rating of 2.7.
MARIUS
04
63.7
OAK scored 63.7 on the MARIUS Score.
Half of that is true shooting (69.0%), 30% is assists per game (26.0 — 10th in the league) and 20% is ball security (8.8 turnovers a game, 11th — where lower is better).
MARIUS
05
11.3%
OAK gave the ball away on 11.3% of their possessions.
Basketball-Reference's definition puts the turnover rate at 10.5% of plays used — 8.8 turnovers per game. Both are shown because they answer slightly different questions: one is per possession, the other per play.
ANOMALY
06
132-78
Their best night was a 132-78 win against LAR.
Game 24, a net rating of 68.0 on 79.4 possessions. They made 53 of 67 shots and pulled in 37 rebounds. It came on the road.
ANOMALY
07
75-120
Their worst night was a 75-120 loss against OPP.
Game 14, a net rating of -57.7. They turned the ball over 12 times and gave up 48 points in the paint.
RECORD
08
5/4
Their longest winning run was 5 games; the longest losing run 4.
Read off the game log in order, so a streak is a real sequence of results rather than a count of wins. They also played 4 games decided by five points or fewer (13.3%) and 14 decided by twenty or more (46.7%).
RECORD
09
5-9
At home OAK went 5-9; on the road 10-6.
35.7% of home games won against 62.5% away. Their home net rating was -1.2 and their away net rating 6.1 — the same team, two different levels.
CONTEXT
10
-5.7
OAK's scoring margin was -0.9 a game at home and 4.8 on the road.
That is a home-court edge of -5.7 points a game. Across the league the host outscores the visitor by -1.4, so the venue is doing less for them than it does for the average team.
STYLE
11
33.6
OAK's performance swung 33.6 net rating points between games.
The standard deviation of their per-game net rating, across 30 games with a box score. The league's steadiest side sits near 18.8; the wildest near 33.6.
CONTRACT
12
$15.0M
OAK pays Jay Wilson $15.0M — 13.3% of its payroll.
A roster of 12 on $113.0M, comfortably under the cap. The spending is spread fairly evenly across the squad.