HEAD TO HEAD
Two players on the same eleven metrics. The rail under each one is a percentile against every player with at least 10 games this season, and it is flipped for the metrics where lower is better — so a longer rail always means the better player, and the raw numbers stay on either side so nothing is hidden to make the chart tidier.
01 / Metric by metric
Monte Parson II vs Zay Russell
10.5
63th · 99th
35.1
4.7
76th · 62th
3.1
1.7
40th · 90th
5.3
70.2%
63th · 88th
79.3%
14.9%
34th · 98th
36.7%
7.4%
27th · 90th
28.7%
12.3%
69th · 49th
6.7%
30.0%
51th · 25th
18.2%
34.8%
62th · 73th
42.7%
8.2%
69th · 91th · lower is better
5.9%
18.3
63th · 99th
46.7
The rail runs 0 to 100 in percentile terms: the left-hand number is where Monte Parson II's figure sits among every qualified player, the right-hand one where Zay Russell's does. Two different units share one axis because a percentile has no units.
02 / Context
THE SAME PLAYERS, IN WORDS
Roles and load
| Line | Monte Parson II | Zay Russell |
|---|---|---|
| Position | PF | SG |
| Team | DET | CHI · VAN |
| Games | 30 | 29 |
| Minutes per game | 26.1 | 30.9 |
| Points | 315 | 1018 |
The money
| Line | Monte Parson II | Zay Russell |
|---|---|---|
| S4 salary | $12.0M | $40.0M |
| Term | 2+1 | 5 years |
| Value ratio | 1.09× | 1.05× |
| Surplus | +$1.0M | +$2.1M |
Salary comes from the contracts export, which lists next season's roster while the stats cover this season — so a player signed elsewhere still carries this season's production. Full cap sheet →